Leigh Eric Schmidt

37 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Leigh Eric Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • History 165
  • Religious studies 80
  • Philosophy 105
  • Geography, Planning and Development 39
  • Sociology and Political Science 302
Replace Jack Santino with:
Jack Santino United States
Willem Frijhoff Netherlands
Philip F. Gura United States
Merry E. Wiesner‐Hanks United States
R. Laurence Moore United States
Kieran Quinlan United States
Orest Ranum United States
Michael Beehler
Philip Goodchild United Kingdom
Tom Conley United States
Leigh Eric Schmidt relative to Jack Santino United States Jack Santino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Jack Santino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leigh Eric Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leigh Eric Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leigh Eric Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leigh Eric Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leigh Eric Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leigh Eric Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leigh Eric Schmidt. The network helps show where Leigh Eric Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leigh Eric Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leigh Eric Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Leigh Eric Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Consumer Rites: The Buying and Selling of American Holidays
199599
2 200388
3 199150
4
Holy Fairs: Scotland and the Making of American Revivalism
198948
5 200147
6 201633
7 201231
8 200127
9 199125
10 199422
11 199718
12 201215
13 199814
14 199614
15 200213
16 198910
17 200210
18 19938
19 19917
20 20166

About Leigh Eric Schmidt

Leigh Eric Schmidt is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Philosophy and Religious studies, having authored 48 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (18 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (10 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (6 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (3 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers) and Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (165 citations), Religious studies (80 citations), Philosophy (105 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (39 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (302 citations). Leigh Eric Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Noll, Margaret C. Jacob, Stephen J. Stein, Vincent Vinikas, Susan L. Mizruchi, Donald G. Mathews, Russell E. Richey, Michael J. Crawford, Catherine L. Albanese and Jonathan Edwards. Their work appears in journals such as The William and Mary Quarterly, Church History, Journal of American History, Religion and American Culture A Journal of Interpretation and Reviews in American History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact