Lee-Peng Teo

1.3k citations
53 papers · 786 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Lee-Peng Teo

52 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers

Lee-Peng Teo
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Modeling and Simulation 165
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 382
  • Applied Mathematics 198
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 273
  • Geometry and Topology 116
Replace A. Elhanbaly with:
A. Elhanbaly Egypt
Jayme Vaz Brazil
Anatol Odzijewicz Poland
G. E. Prince Australia
Yong Huang China
M. Lutzky United States
C. J. Howls United Kingdom
V. V. Nesterenko Russia
Rajesh Kumar Gupta India
Adri B. Olde Daalhuis United Kingdom
Lee-Peng Teo relative to A. Elhanbaly Egypt A. Elhanbaly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
A. Elhanbaly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lee-Peng Teo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lee-Peng Teo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee-Peng Teo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee-Peng Teo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lee-Peng Teo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee-Peng Teo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee-Peng Teo. The network helps show where Lee-Peng Teo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Lee-Peng Teo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lee-Peng Teo Line = papers co-authored together Lee-Peng Teo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008133
2 200682
3 201136
4 201331
5 201129
6 200929
7 201128
8 200826
9 200924
10 200923
11 200722
12 201222
13 201022
14 200920
15 200920
16 200719
17 200319
18 200416
19 201015
20 200613

About Lee-Peng Teo

Lee-Peng Teo is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geometry and Topology and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 53 papers that have together received 786 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (36 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (27 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (21 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (7 papers), Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies (7 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers), Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (4 papers) and Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (165 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (382 citations), Applied Mathematics (198 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (273 citations) and Geometry and Topology (116 citations). Lee-Peng Teo has collaborated with scholars based in Malaysia, China and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Sungbin Lim, Ming Li, Leon A. Takhtajan, M. Bordag, Fech Scen Khoo and Jinsung Park. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters B, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical, Communications in Mathematical Physics, Physical Review A and International Journal of Modern Physics A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact