Leena Luís

648 citations
16 papers · 131 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Leena Luís

16 papers receiving 112 citations

Peers

Leena Luís
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 121
  • Plant Science 102
  • Ecology 25
  • Oceanography 3
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 3
Replace Vinay Sahu with:
Vinay Sahu India
Jorge R. Flores Argentina
Ana Losada-Lima Spain
Jaime Uribe-M. Colombia
G. Ya. Doroshina Russia
Roberta Tacchi Italy
Jovana Pantović Serbia
Tomoyuki Katagiri Japan
Gary B. Perlmutter United States
Heribert Köckinger Switzerland
Leena Luís relative to Vinay Sahu India Vinay Sahu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Vinay Sahu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leena Luís

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leena Luís's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leena Luís with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leena Luís more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leena Luís

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leena Luís. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leena Luís. The network helps show where Leena Luís may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leena Luís, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leena Luís Line = papers co-authored together Leena Luís links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200932
2 201116
3 200811
4 20099
5 20159
6 20049
7 20107
8 20126
9
A comparison of bryophyte diversity in the Macaronesian Islands: island versus habitat approach
20136
10 20106
11 20116
12 20065
13 20084
14
Atrichum androgynum (Mull. Hal.) A. Jaeger in Portugal, Azores and Madeira, new to the European bryoflora.
20103
15
New information on the threatened status of some bryophyte taxa from Madeira Island streams.
20091
16
On the status of Hygroamblystegium tenax in Madeira Island.
20091

About Leena Luís

Leena Luís is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Ecology, Molecular Biology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 131 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bryophyte Studies and Records (14 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (12 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (10 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (3 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (2 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (1 paper), Marine and coastal plant biology (1 paper) and Environmental Science and Water Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (121 citations), Plant Science (102 citations), Ecology (25 citations), Oceanography (3 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (3 citations). Leena Luís has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Manuela Sim‐Sim, Michael Stech, Ariel Bergamini, Susana Fontinha, Cecı́lia Sérgio, M. Glória Esquível, Marc Lebouvier, Rui Figueira, Tamás Pócs and Sandra Martins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bryology, Flavour and Fragrance Journal, Cryptogamie Bryologie, The Bryologist and Aquatic Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact