Lee Pyne‐Mercier

425 citations
7 papers · 234 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Lee Pyne‐Mercier

7 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers

Lee Pyne‐Mercier
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Microbiology 40
  • Physiology 105
  • Infectious Diseases 54
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 3
  • General Social Sciences 5
Replace Mónica Alonso with:
Mónica Alonso United States
Morkor Newman Owiredu Switzerland
Edward Bitarakwate United States
Dorothy C. Nyemba South Africa
Nashaba Matin United Kingdom
Tara Mtuy United Kingdom
Robin R. Hennessy United States
Li-Gang Yang China
Virginia Furner Australia
Emily Lord United Kingdom
Lee Pyne‐Mercier relative to Mónica Alonso United States Mónica Alonso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mónica Alonso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lee Pyne‐Mercier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lee Pyne‐Mercier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee Pyne‐Mercier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee Pyne‐Mercier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lee Pyne‐Mercier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee Pyne‐Mercier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee Pyne‐Mercier. The network helps show where Lee Pyne‐Mercier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lee Pyne‐Mercier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lee Pyne‐Mercier Line = papers co-authored together Lee Pyne‐Mercier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2017119
2 201134
3 201332
4 201918
5 201914
6 20159
7 20178

About Lee Pyne‐Mercier

Lee Pyne‐Mercier is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology, General Health Professions and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (1 paper), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (1 paper) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (40 citations), Physiology (105 citations), Infectious Diseases (54 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (3 citations) and General Social Sciences (5 citations). Lee Pyne‐Mercier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Melanie Taylor, Morkor Newman Owiredu, Maeve B. Mello, Michael L. Campbell, Leopold Ouédraogo, Nancy Kidula, Michael H. Chung, Grace John‐Stewart, Barbra A. Richardson and Erica Lessem. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Global Health, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Reproductive Health, PLoS Medicine and AIDS Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact