Leanne Proops
Impact in
- Equine top 0.2%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in
-
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 21
- Equine 11
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research 11
- Co-authors
- Karen McComb (13 shared papers)David Reby (1 shared paper)Faith Adelaide Burden (14 shared papers)Amy Victoria Smith (5 shared papers)Jennifer Wathan (6 shared papers)Britta Osthaus (6 shared papers)Zoe Raw (7 shared papers)Anna Magdalena Taylor (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (5 papers)Animal Cognition (4 papers)PLoS ONE (4 papers)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (2 papers)Applied Animal Behaviour Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Leanne Proops
36 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Equine 400
- Small Animals 528
- Developmental Biology 152
- Genetics 726
- Sensory Systems 93
Countries citing papers authored by Leanne Proops
This map shows the geographic impact of Leanne Proops's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leanne Proops with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leanne Proops more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leanne Proops
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leanne Proops. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leanne Proops. The network helps show where Leanne Proops may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leanne Proops, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 202 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 141 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 115 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 112 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 70 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 65 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 46 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 42 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 13 |
About Leanne Proops
Leanne Proops is a scholar working on Small Animals, Equine, Genetics, Social Psychology and Developmental Biology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (25 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (21 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (11 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (6 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (400 citations), Small Animals (528 citations), Developmental Biology (152 citations), Genetics (726 citations) and Sensory Systems (93 citations). Leanne Proops has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Karen McComb, David Reby, Faith Adelaide Burden, Amy Victoria Smith, Jennifer Wathan, Britta Osthaus, Zoe Raw, Anna Magdalena Taylor, Eszter Somogyi and Sophie Kerttu Scott. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Animal Cognition, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Applied Animal Behaviour Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.