Leah Acker

20 papers receiving 700 citations

Peers

Leah Acker
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 472
  • Developmental Neuroscience 62
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 65
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 239
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 28
Replace Tian Yu with:
Tian Yu China
Sachi Ohno Japan
Christiane Vahle-Hinz Germany
Kameel M. Karkar United States
James Anstey United States
Meng‐Li Tsai Taiwan
David Stagg United Kingdom
Esther Sydekum Switzerland
Sherveen N. Parivash United States
A. C. Nacimiento Germany
Leah Acker relative to Tian Yu China Tian Yu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tian Yu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leah Acker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leah Acker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leah Acker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leah Acker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leah Acker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leah Acker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leah Acker. The network helps show where Leah Acker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leah Acker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leah Acker Line = papers co-authored together Leah Acker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Noninvasive optical inhibition with a red-shifted microbial rhodopsin
2014375
2 201794
3 201673
4 201068
5 202221
6 202115
7 202314
8 202311
9 202111
10 20238
11 20224
12 20173
13 20073
14 20192
15 20072
16 20251
17 19981
18 20241
19 20211
20 20171

About Leah Acker

Leah Acker is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (11 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (472 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (62 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (65 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (239 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (28 citations). Leah Acker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Edward S. Boyden, Robert Desimone, Volker Busskamp, Craig R. Forest, Yingxi Lin, Andrew J. Young, Rachel C. Bandler, Nathan C Klapoetke, Brian D. Allen and Jessica A. Cardin. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Alzheimer s & Dementia and Medical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact