L.C. Nathan

680 citations
28 papers · 609 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

L.C. Nathan

28 papers receiving 574 citations

Peers

L.C. Nathan
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Inorganic Chemistry 259
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 283
  • Oncology 339
  • Organic Chemistry 216
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 54
Replace Michael R. Rosenthal with:
Michael R. Rosenthal United States
Alan J. Jircitano United States
M. A. Pellinghelli Italy
Chung‐Kwong Poon Hong Kong
Hiroaki Kido Japan
P.S. Zacharias India
Bruno Pitteri Italy
Edgar Müller Germany
Cungen Zhang China
I.S. Ahüja India
L.C. Nathan relative to Michael R. Rosenthal United States Michael R. Rosenthal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Michael R. Rosenthal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L.C. Nathan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L.C. Nathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.C. Nathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.C. Nathan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L.C. Nathan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.C. Nathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.C. Nathan. The network helps show where L.C. Nathan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L.C. Nathan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L.C. Nathan Line = papers co-authored together L.C. Nathan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200375
2 200453
3 200052
4 196942
5 199939
6 196838
7 198537
8 197429
9 200328
10 200321
11 198920
12 200519
13 196817
14 197816
15 198516
16 200314
17 197612
18 199912
19 196911
20 197411

About L.C. Nathan

L.C. Nathan is a scholar working on Oncology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal complexes synthesis and properties (17 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (12 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (9 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (4 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (3 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (2 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (2 papers) and Electron Spin Resonance Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (259 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (283 citations), Oncology (339 citations), Organic Chemistry (216 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (54 citations). L.C. Nathan has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ronald O. Ragsdale, John H. Nelson, Paul S. Wagenknecht, Joshua M. Gilmore, Curtis Clark, Jessica E. Koehne, Chuanjiang Hu, C.A. Traina, Donald C. Zapien and Christopher R. Moylan. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Inorganica Chimica Acta, Polyhedron, Acta Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact