L.A.M. Stolte

1.1k citations
66 papers · 802 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

L.A.M. Stolte

64 papers receiving 709 citations

Peers

L.A.M. Stolte
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 200
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 328
  • Developmental Biology 19
  • Reproductive Medicine 58
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Raja W. Abdul‐Karim with:
Raja W. Abdul‐Karim United States
William A. W. Walters Australia
J. G. Bibby United Kingdom
N. F. Gant United States
Nebojša Radunović Serbia
Rada Boskovic Canada
D.P. Alexander United Kingdom
Sheila L. B. Duncan United Kingdom
Ayşe Kafkaslı Türkiye
Murray Luckas United Kingdom
L.A.M. Stolte relative to Raja W. Abdul‐Karim United States Raja W. Abdul‐Karim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Raja W. Abdul‐Karim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L.A.M. Stolte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L.A.M. Stolte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.A.M. Stolte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.A.M. Stolte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L.A.M. Stolte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.A.M. Stolte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.A.M. Stolte. The network helps show where L.A.M. Stolte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L.A.M. Stolte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L.A.M. Stolte Line = papers co-authored together L.A.M. Stolte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197164
2 196744
3 197141
4 196240
5 196536
6 197332
7 196428
8 197127
9 196226
10 197624
11 196622
12 196521
13 197821
14 197418
15 196718
16 197818
17 197817
18 195616
19 196415
20 196015

About L.A.M. Stolte

L.A.M. Stolte is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 802 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (17 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (9 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (6 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (6 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (4 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers) and Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (200 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (328 citations), Developmental Biology (19 citations), Reproductive Medicine (58 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). L.A.M. Stolte has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. Janssens, T.K.A.B. Eskes, Jan de Haan, Jan H. van Bemmel, H. van Kessel, J. H. Oort, Bart Versteeg, Henk C.S. Wallenburg, J. de Graaff and J. P. A. Baak. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Lancet, European Journal of Endocrinology and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact