L. Perring

881 citations
38 papers · 695 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

L. Perring

38 papers receiving 672 citations

Peers

L. Perring
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • General Materials Science 106
  • Analytical Chemistry 266
  • Radiation 147
  • Pollution 82
  • Electrochemistry 35
Replace G. T�lg with:
G. T�lg Germany
E. Grallath Germany
Vitaly Panchuk Russia
A. I. Saprykin Russia
Sebastian Recknagel Germany
Akihiro Ono Japan
M. A. Margulis Russia
G. Kaiser Germany
Tomáš Černohorský Czechia
P. Tsch�pel Germany
L. Perring relative to G. T�lg Germany G. T�lg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×53×
G. T�lg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. Perring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Perring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Perring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Perring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Perring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Perring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Perring. The network helps show where L. Perring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside L. Perring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. Perring Line = papers co-authored together L. Perring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200267
2 200353
3 199943
4 201142
5 200139
6 200534
7 199932
8 200429
9 200027
10 200123
11 200522
12 201622
13 199620
14 200120
15 200819
16 202218
17 199717
18 200815
19 200715
20 201715

About L. Perring

L. Perring is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Radiation, Analytical Chemistry, General Materials Science and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (14 papers), Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties (14 papers), Heavy Metals in Plants (13 papers), Metallurgical and Alloy Processes (10 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (8 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (7 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (6 papers) and Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Materials Science (106 citations), Analytical Chemistry (266 citations), Radiation (147 citations), Pollution (82 citations) and Electrochemistry (35 citations). L. Perring has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, France and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Andrey, J.C. Gachon, F. Bussy, P. Feschotte, Julius C. Schuster, Yong Du, Claudia Mujahid, Kateřina Lancová, Pascal Zbinden and Aurélien Desmarchelier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Food Analytical Methods, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion and Intermetallics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact