Kyoko Aoki

772 citations
19 papers · 608 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Kyoko Aoki

18 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers

Kyoko Aoki
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Genetics 302
  • Ecological Modeling 48
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 207
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 123
  • Plant Science 145
Replace Aikaterini Dounavi with:
Aikaterini Dounavi Germany
Isabelle Boutin-Ganache Canada
Annika Perry United Kingdom
Nicholas D. Levsen United States
Hassan Sbay France
T.‐Y. Chiang Taiwan
Elena Mosca Italy
Urs Büchler Switzerland
Susana Valencia‐Ávalos Mexico
Ichiro Tamaki Japan
Kyoko Aoki relative to Aikaterini Dounavi Germany Aikaterini Dounavi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Aikaterini Dounavi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyoko Aoki

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyoko Aoki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyoko Aoki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyoko Aoki more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyoko Aoki

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyoko Aoki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyoko Aoki. The network helps show where Kyoko Aoki may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyoko Aoki, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyoko Aoki Line = papers co-authored together Kyoko Aoki links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2004155
2 2006103
3 201170
4 199946
5 201439
6 201125
7 200624
8 200923
9 200023
10 200923
11 200320
12 200414
13 200113
14 20109
15 20058
16 20235
17 20104
18 20163
19 19681

About Kyoko Aoki

Kyoko Aoki is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Insect Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (8 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Ecology and Conservation Studies (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (302 citations), Ecological Modeling (48 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (207 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (123 citations) and Plant Science (145 citations). Kyoko Aoki has collaborated with scholars based in Japan. Frequent co-authors include Noriaki Murakami, Takeshi Suzuki, Tsai‐Wen Hsu, Tamotsu Hattori, Takaya Iwasaki, Makoto Kato, Yoshihiko Tsumura, Saneyoshi Ueno, Hiroshi Kumagai and Shigeki Aoki. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Plant Research, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Plant Systematics and Evolution, Nutrients and ˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact