Kyle Siler

25 papers receiving 689 citations

Peers

Kyle Siler
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 296
  • History and Philosophy of Science 315
  • Information Systems and Management 249
  • Safety Research 46
  • General Decision Sciences 8
Replace Misha Teplitskiy with:
Misha Teplitskiy United States
Martin Paul Eve United Kingdom
Chérifa Boukacem‐Zeghmouri France
Marzena Świgoń Poland
Blanca Rodríguez Bravo Spain
Rafael Repiso Caballero Spain
Katie Wilson Australia
Jerry Gaston United States
Leonie van Grootel Netherlands
Kyle Siler relative to Misha Teplitskiy United States Misha Teplitskiy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.8×
Misha Teplitskiy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Siler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Siler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Siler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Siler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Siler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Siler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Siler. The network helps show where Kyle Siler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Siler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Siler Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Siler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014228
2 202064
3 200949
4 201843
5 201943
6 202140
7 201838
8 202237
9 201528
10 201828
11 201627
12 201922
13 201721
14 200813
15 201812
16 201711
17 20218
18 20127
19 20227
20 20234

About Kyle Siler

Kyle Siler is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, History and Philosophy of Science, Information Systems and Management, General Decision Sciences and Information Systems, having authored 28 papers that have together received 738 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (13 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (12 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (7 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (3 papers), Research, Science, and Academia (3 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers) and Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (296 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (315 citations), Information Systems and Management (249 citations), Safety Research (46 citations) and General Decision Sciences (8 citations). Kyle Siler has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kirby P. Lee, Lisa Anne Bero, Vincent Larivière, David Strang, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Koen Frenken, Stefanie Haustein, Juan Pablo Alperín, Philippe Mongeon and Philippe Vincent‐Lamarre. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, College & Research Libraries, Research Policy, Quantitative Science Studies and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact