Kyle Sauerberger

785 citations
11 papers · 113 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Kyle Sauerberger

11 papers receiving 109 citations

Peers

Kyle Sauerberger
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Applied Psychology 21
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 41
  • Clinical Psychology 63
  • Social Psychology 33
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 28
Replace Lorien G. Elleman with:
Lorien G. Elleman United States
Michal Kohút Slovakia
Pavol Kačmár Slovakia
Marta Katarzyna Wronska Poland
Haruka Oikawa Japan
Jeffrey A. Swails United States
Anand Krishna Germany
Joana De Calheiros Velozo Netherlands
Harry Manley Thailand
Ryan J. Walker United States
Kyle Sauerberger relative to Lorien G. Elleman United States Lorien G. Elleman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Lorien G. Elleman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Sauerberger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Sauerberger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Sauerberger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Sauerberger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Sauerberger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Sauerberger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Sauerberger. The network helps show where Kyle Sauerberger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Sauerberger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Sauerberger Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Sauerberger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201928
2 201521
3 201918
4 201613
5 201810
6 20167
7 20244
8 20224
9 20223
10
Members of the International Situations Project
20193
11
When Doing Things Later is the Best Choice: Precrastination as an Individual Difference
20192

About Kyle Sauerberger

Kyle Sauerberger is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 113 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (3 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (21 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (41 citations), Clinical Psychology (63 citations), Social Psychology (33 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (28 citations). Kyle Sauerberger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include David Α. Rosenbaum, David C. Funder, David C. Funder, Patrick J. Morse, Elysia Todd, Thomas R. Zentall, Aleksandra Kaurin, Lisa R. Fournier, Edward A. Wasserman and Robert Rosenthal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research in Personality, Journal of Personality, Behavioural Processes, Psychological Research and Royal Society Open Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact