Kyle Lund
Impact in
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- DNA and Biological Computing
- Ecology top 10%
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Papers in
-
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 7
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry 5
- DNA and Biological Computing 3
- Ecology 2
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 2
- Co-authors
- Hao Yan (7 shared papers)Renjun Pei (1 shared paper)Nadine Dabby (1 shared paper)Jeanette Nangreave (1 shared paper)Alexander Johnson‐Buck (1 shared paper)Steven K. Taylor (1 shared paper)Erik Winfree (1 shared paper)Nils G. Walter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Current Genetics (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry (1 paper)Angewandte Chemie International Edition (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Kyle Lund
9 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Kyle Lund's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Ecology 215
- Biomedical Engineering 348
- Biomaterials 63
- Condensed Matter Physics 45
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Lund
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Lund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Lund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Lund more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Lund
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Lund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Lund. The network helps show where Kyle Lund may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Lund, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Molecular robots guided by prescriptive landscapes Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 765 |
| 2 | 2007 | 121 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 105 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 105 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 7 |
About Kyle Lund
Kyle Lund is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Biomedical Engineering, Infectious Diseases and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (7 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (5 papers), DNA and Biological Computing (3 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (2 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (1 paper), Formal Methods in Verification (1 paper) and Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (1.1k citations), Ecology (215 citations), Biomedical Engineering (348 citations), Biomaterials (63 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (45 citations). Kyle Lund has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hao Yan, Renjun Pei, Nadine Dabby, Jeanette Nangreave, Alexander Johnson‐Buck, Steven K. Taylor, Erik Winfree, Nils G. Walter, Anthony J. Manzo and Nicole Michelotti. Their work appears in journals such as Current Genetics, Nature, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.