Kyle Jackman

412 citations
18 papers · 285 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Kyle Jackman

17 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Kyle Jackman
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Condensed Matter Physics 165
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 158
  • Hardware and Architecture 21
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 162
  • Artificial Intelligence 46
Replace Amol Inamdar with:
Amol Inamdar United States
Y.A. Polyakov United States
Terence J. Weir United States
Anna Kidiyarova-Shevchenko Sweden
Andrei Talalaevskii United States
F.-I. Buchholz Germany
Quentin Herr United States
Seigo Kotani Japan
W.H. Henkels United States
M. Dorojevets United States
Kyle Jackman relative to Amol Inamdar United States Amol Inamdar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Amol Inamdar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle Jackman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle Jackman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle Jackman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle Jackman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle Jackman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle Jackman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle Jackman. The network helps show where Kyle Jackman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Kyle Jackman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle Jackman Line = papers co-authored together Kyle Jackman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2019104
2 201947
3 201620
4 201618
5 202115
6 201913
7 201512
8 202311
9 20209
10 20199
11 20208
12 20215
13 20224
14 20233
15 20173
16 20192
17 20182
18 20240

About Kyle Jackman

Kyle Jackman is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hardware and Architecture and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 18 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (12 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (8 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (3 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (3 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (3 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (3 papers) and Simulation Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (165 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (158 citations), Hardware and Architecture (21 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (162 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (46 citations). Kyle Jackman has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Japan and France. Frequent co-authors include Coenrad Johann Fourie, Nobuyuki Yoshikawa, Pascal Febvre, Christopher Lawrence Ayala, Sandeep Gupta, Mark E. Law, Matthys M. Botha, Yanzi Wang, Massoud Pedram and Murali Annavaram. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology and Journal of Physics Conference Series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact