Kyle E. Thomson

1.3k citations
29 papers · 943 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Kyle E. Thomson

28 papers receiving 922 citations

Peers

Kyle E. Thomson
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 461
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 344
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 195
  • Neurology 58
  • Signal Processing 63
Replace Waldemar B. Swiercz with:
Waldemar B. Swiercz United States
Annika Lüttjohann Germany
Vicente Iragui‐Madoz United States
Deepak Madhavan United States
Michele C. Jackson United States
Lars Emil Larsen Belgium
Joost Wagenaar United States
Marco Leite United Kingdom
Wenbo Zhang China
Xiaolu Jiang China
Kyle E. Thomson relative to Waldemar B. Swiercz United States Waldemar B. Swiercz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Waldemar B. Swiercz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle E. Thomson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle E. Thomson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle E. Thomson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle E. Thomson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle E. Thomson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle E. Thomson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle E. Thomson. The network helps show where Kyle E. Thomson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle E. Thomson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle E. Thomson Line = papers co-authored together Kyle E. Thomson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010195
2 2007108
3 201791
4 201766
5 200964
6 200958
7 201356
8 202251
9 202051
10 201638
11 201927
12 201425
13 201722
14 202022
15 202121
16 20059
17 20206
18 20056
19 20055
20
Lengthy commutes in Australia
20165

About Kyle E. Thomson

Kyle E. Thomson is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Signal Processing, having authored 29 papers that have together received 943 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (9 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (9 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers) and Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (461 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (344 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (195 citations), Neurology (58 citations) and Signal Processing (63 citations). Kyle E. Thomson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bradley E. Greger, Paul A. House, Spencer Kellis, Richard B. Brown, Karen S. Wilcox, H. Steve White, Kai Miller, Karim G. Oweiss, Yasir Suhail and Andrew J. Mason. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Experimental Neurology, Journal of Neurophysiology, eLife and eNeuro.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact