Kyle E. Giesler
Impact in
- Molecular Medicine top 10%
- Curcumin's Biomedical Applications
-
- HIV Research and Treatment
Papers in
- Virology 5
- HIV Research and Treatment 5
-
- HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment 4
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions 2
- Co-authors
- Dennis C. Liotta (7 shared papers)David T. Restrepo (4 shared papers)Richard G. Blair (3 shared papers)Thomas M. Shinnick (1 shared paper)Aiming Sun (1 shared paper)Bettina Bommarius (1 shared paper)James P. Snyder (1 shared paper)Ruth J. Napier (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (4 papers)European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (2 papers)Applied Clay Science (1 paper)Materials Research Bulletin (1 paper)Oncotarget (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Kyle E. Giesler
13 papers receiving 336 citations
Kyle E. Giesler's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Molecular Medicine 38
- Virology 30
- Catalysis 22
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 50
- Infectious Diseases 50
Countries citing papers authored by Kyle E. Giesler
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle E. Giesler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle E. Giesler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle E. Giesler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle E. Giesler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle E. Giesler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle E. Giesler. The network helps show where Kyle E. Giesler may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyle E. Giesler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AI is a viable alternative to high throughput screening: a 318-target study Hit paper breakdown → | 2024 | 90 |
| 2 | 2015 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 2 |
About Kyle E. Giesler
Kyle E. Giesler is a scholar working on Virology, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Medicine, Ceramics and Composites and Biochemistry, having authored 13 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV Research and Treatment (5 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (4 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers), Crystal Structures and Properties (1 paper), Curcumin's Biomedical Applications (1 paper), Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research (1 paper), Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties (1 paper) and Biochemical and Molecular Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (38 citations), Virology (30 citations), Catalysis (22 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (50 citations) and Infectious Diseases (50 citations). Kyle E. Giesler has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Dennis C. Liotta, David T. Restrepo, Richard G. Blair, Thomas M. Shinnick, Aiming Sun, Bettina Bommarius, James P. Snyder, Ruth J. Napier, Daniel Kalman and Kimberly R. Powell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Applied Clay Science, Materials Research Bulletin and Oncotarget.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.