Kyle C. Burch

473 citations
16 papers · 411 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Kyle C. Burch

14 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Kyle C. Burch
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Catalysis 119
  • Biomedical Engineering 248
  • Inorganic Chemistry 78
  • Mechanical Engineering 202
  • Materials Chemistry 198
Replace Daniel M. Ginosar with:
Daniel M. Ginosar United States
Tongqi Ye China
Ali Taheri Najafabadi Iran
Jasmin Blanchard Canada
Young-Seek Yoon South Korea
Wonho Jung South Korea
Kai Jarosch Canada
Hee-Jun Eom South Korea
Luciene Santos Carvalho Brazil
Xuancan Zhu China
Kyle C. Burch relative to Daniel M. Ginosar United States Daniel M. Ginosar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Daniel M. Ginosar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kyle C. Burch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kyle C. Burch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyle C. Burch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyle C. Burch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kyle C. Burch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyle C. Burch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyle C. Burch. The network helps show where Kyle C. Burch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Kyle C. Burch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kyle C. Burch Line = papers co-authored together Kyle C. Burch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200686
2 200879
3 200858
4 200756
5 200430
6 200429
7 200528
8 201118
9 200510
10 20059
11 20213
12 20072
13 20251
14 20171
15
Catalyst Needs for Thermochemical Hydrogen Production Cycles
20071
16
Activated carbon catalysts for the production of hydrogen via the sulfur―iodine thermochemical water splitting cycle
20090

About Kyle C. Burch

Kyle C. Burch is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Inorganic Chemistry, Catalysis, Materials Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (7 papers), Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes (7 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (5 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (3 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (3 papers), Covalent Organic Framework Applications (2 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (2 papers) and Adsorption and Cooling Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (119 citations), Biomedical Engineering (248 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (78 citations), Mechanical Engineering (202 citations) and Materials Chemistry (198 citations). Kyle C. Burch has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Daniel M. Ginosar, Lucı́a M. Petkovic, Harry W. Rollins, David N. Thompson, Daniel M. Ginosar, P. J. Pinhero, H. H. Farrell, Fabiana Sardella, Cristina Deiana and David J. Zalewski. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Applied Catalysis A General, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Transfusion and Journal of Catalysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact