Kuo Yang

90 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Kuo Yang's Hit Papers

SymMap: an integrative database of traditional Chinese medicine enhanced by symptom mapping 2018 · 425 citations
4250+2+5Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Kuo Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 311
  • Pharmacology 138
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 224
  • Molecular Biology 807
  • Plant Science 318
Replace Jiahua Jiang with:
Jiahua Jiang United States
Kejun Deng China
Peiyu Yan China
Yühong Huang China
Leihong Wu United States
Jiantao Ye China
Cheng‐Wei Yang Taiwan
Jinjin Xu China
Ran Duan China
Zhixing Cao China
Kuo Yang relative to Jiahua Jiang United States Jiahua Jiang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.6×
Jiahua Jiang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kuo Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kuo Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kuo Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kuo Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kuo Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kuo Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kuo Yang. The network helps show where Kuo Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kuo Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kuo Yang Line = papers co-authored together Kuo Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
SymMap: an integrative database of traditional Chinese medicine enhanced by symptom mapping
Hit paper breakdown →
2018425
2 202182
3 201872
4 202170
5 202161
6 202256
7 202251
8 202051
9 201650
10 202143
11 201940
12 202140
13 202239
14 201334
15 202232
16 202431
17 202228
18 202026
19 201825
20 201724

About Kuo Yang

Kuo Yang is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Complementary and alternative medicine, Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Automotive Engineering, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (19 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (18 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (10 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (9 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (9 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (8 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (8 papers) and Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (311 citations), Pharmacology (138 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (224 citations), Molecular Biology (807 citations) and Plant Science (318 citations). Kuo Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Xuezhong Zhou, Jianxin Chen, Chun-Xiang You, Yi Chen Zhao, Hui Li, Yang Wu, Shuangsang Fang, Dechao Bu, Feilong Zhang and Wei Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Briefings in Bioinformatics, Pharmacological Research, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B and BioMed Research International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact