Kun Lin

1.1k citations
43 papers · 861 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Kun Lin

42 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

Kun Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Modeling and Simulation 76
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 119
  • Cancer Research 77
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 101
  • Otorhinolaryngology 17
Replace Meng Yang with:
Meng Yang China
Jie Sheng China
Haiyan Guo China
Zhiguang Zhao China
Fengming Huang China
Vincent L. Freeman United States
Esther Erdei United States
Peng Shi China
Claire D. Sherman United States
Delphine Praud France
Kun Lin relative to Meng Yang China Meng Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30.5×
Meng Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kun Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kun Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kun Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kun Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kun Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kun Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kun Lin. The network helps show where Kun Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kun Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kun Lin Line = papers co-authored together Kun Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005107
2 201454
3 201546
4 200240
5 201538
6 201436
7 201436
8 201833
9 201433
10 201531
11
XRCC1 Arg399Gln gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies.
201130
12 201630
13 201528
14 201527
15 202125
16 201725
17 201524
18 200320
19 201520
20 201418

About Kun Lin

Kun Lin is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 861 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (6 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (4 papers), Water Treatment and Disinfection (3 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (3 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (76 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (119 citations), Cancer Research (77 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (101 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (17 citations). Kun Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kusheng Wu, Dyt Fong, Johan Karlberg, Jiaying Fang, William W. Au, Yongning Wu, Zhaoliang Shan, Yutang Wang, Wen‐Ying Shen and Zhong‐Ying Shen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, International Journal of Cancer, Thrombosis Research and Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact