Kosuke Okamoto

39 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Kosuke Okamoto
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 131
  • Otorhinolaryngology 11
  • Physiology 48
  • Spectroscopy 24
  • Endocrinology 7
Replace Takahiro Inoue with:
Takahiro Inoue Japan
Sasha McGee United States
Meike Hengst Germany
Yuan Long China
Jian-Yu Rao United States
Sundar Victor United States
Abhijit Pethe United States
Shiyun Liu China
Elisabeth Rehberg Germany
S Hashimoto Japan
Kosuke Okamoto relative to Takahiro Inoue Japan Takahiro Inoue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Takahiro Inoue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kosuke Okamoto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kosuke Okamoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kosuke Okamoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kosuke Okamoto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kosuke Okamoto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kosuke Okamoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kosuke Okamoto. The network helps show where Kosuke Okamoto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kosuke Okamoto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kosuke Okamoto Line = papers co-authored together Kosuke Okamoto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200650
2 200136
3 200625
4 200320
5 199918
6 202018
7 200315
8 200015
9 200613
10 200012
11 200612
12 200611
13 198610
14 19858
15 20048
16 19855
17 19945
18 19875
19 19755
20
[Differential diagnosis between recurrence of gliomas and radiation necrosis by 201TlCl SPECT].
19945

About Kosuke Okamoto

Kosuke Okamoto is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (9 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (5 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (5 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (4 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (4 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers) and Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (131 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (11 citations), Physiology (48 citations), Spectroscopy (24 citations) and Endocrinology (7 citations). Kosuke Okamoto has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Bruce K. Rubin, Jung Soo Kim, Jungsoo Kim, Yuichi Majima, Takeshi Shimizu, Koichi Takayama, S. Komiya, Daniel J. Hassett, Luigi M. De Luca and Maria Vincenza Chiantore. Their work appears in journals such as Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Pediatric Pulmonology, CHEST Journal and American Journal of Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact