Koos de Wit

634 citations
15 papers · 259 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Liver Disease and Transplantation 8
    • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis 2
    • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment 7

Koos de Wit

13 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

Koos de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Hepatology 117
  • Epidemiology 128
  • Oncology 82
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 47
Replace Omar Elshaarawy with:
Omar Elshaarawy Egypt
Carlos Romero‐Marrero United States
Thinesh Lee Krishnamoorthy Singapore
Megan Kelly United States
Dongbok Shin South Korea
Cheng-Yao Lin Taiwan
Wacław Hołówko Poland
Maren H. Harms Netherlands
Lorenzo Maroni Italy
Marta Cervera Spain
Koos de Wit relative to Omar Elshaarawy Egypt Omar Elshaarawy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Omar Elshaarawy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Koos de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Koos de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koos de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koos de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Koos de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koos de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koos de Wit. The network helps show where Koos de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Koos de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Koos de Wit Line = papers co-authored together Koos de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 202184
2 201674
3 202031
4 201826
5 202326
6 20226
7
[A day in the life of a medical resident on the ward].
20182
8 20242
9 20232
10
Een dag uit het leven van de zaalarts interne geneeskunde
20182
11
Doppler follow-up after TIPS placement is not routinely indicated. A 16-years single centre experience.
20202
12 20061
13 20181
14 20240
15 20220

About Koos de Wit

Koos de Wit is a scholar working on Hepatology, Epidemiology, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease and Transplantation (8 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (117 citations), Epidemiology (128 citations), Oncology (82 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (47 citations). Koos de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara A.J. Bastiaansen, Joep IJspeert, Evelien Dekker, Manon van der Vlugt, Paul Fockens, Ulrich Beuers, Jonel Trebicka, Elisa Pose, Vı́ctor Vargas and Elsa Solà. Their work appears in journals such as Liver International, Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Endoscopy, BMJ Open Gastroenterology and European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact