Koen Smit

1.1k citations
69 papers · 822 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Koen Smit

65 papers receiving 795 citations

Peers

Koen Smit
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Applied Psychology 79
  • Catalysis 62
  • Epidemiology 227
  • Management Information Systems 65
  • Clinical Psychology 108
Replace Danhong Chen with:
Danhong Chen China
Jun Na China
Minsun Lee South Korea
Joran Lokkerbol Netherlands
Kiran Ijaz Australia
Nadine E. Karlsson Sweden
Marian Levy United States
Niilo Saranummi Finland
Yanwen Wang China
Laura Beth Silver United States
Koen Smit relative to Danhong Chen China Danhong Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31×
Danhong Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Koen Smit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Koen Smit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Koen Smit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Koen Smit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Koen Smit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Koen Smit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Koen Smit. The network helps show where Koen Smit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Koen Smit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Koen Smit Line = papers co-authored together Koen Smit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015183
2 2020110
3 201891
4 201838
5 201738
6 201533
7 201922
8 202122
9
Identifying Factors Affecting Blockchain Technology Diffusion
201820
10 202020
11 201818
12 202318
13 202214
14 201614
15 202213
16 202012
17 202011
18 201710
19 20199
20
A Review of AI Principles in Practice
20208

About Koen Smit

Koen Smit is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems, Epidemiology, Applied Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 69 papers that have together received 822 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (18 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (11 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (7 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (6 papers), Data Quality and Management (3 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (79 citations), Catalysis (62 citations), Epidemiology (227 citations), Management Information Systems (65 citations) and Clinical Psychology (108 citations). Koen Smit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Emmanuel N. Kuntsche, Wiebren de Jong, John Harinck, Onursal Yakaboylu, Carmen V. Voogt, Marloes Kleinjan, Roy Otten, Yvette Mojica‐Perez, Sarah Callinan and Rutger C. M. E. Engels. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Addiction, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, Drug and Alcohol Review and Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact