K.M. Koh

934 citations
71 papers · 542 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

K.M. Koh

63 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

K.M. Koh
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 180
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 456
  • Geometry and Topology 204
  • Algebra and Number Theory 26
  • Computer Networks and Communications 78
Replace Robert Woodrow with:
Robert Woodrow Canada
Mohamed H. El-Zahar Canada
Charles Payan France
María Luz Puertas Spain
Roberto Frucht Chile
T. D. Parsons United States
Oriol Serra Spain
Peter Che Bor Lam Hong Kong
Michael Krivelevich Israel
Gábor Simonyi Hungary
K.M. Koh relative to Robert Woodrow Canada Robert Woodrow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Robert Woodrow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K.M. Koh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.M. Koh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.M. Koh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.M. Koh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.M. Koh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.M. Koh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.M. Koh. The network helps show where K.M. Koh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside K.M. Koh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K.M. Koh Line = papers co-authored together K.M. Koh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200594
2 199739
3 199020
4 199519
5 199618
6 199616
7 200716
8 197915
9 200215
10 198014
11 199713
12 197313
13 199713
14 199212
15 199012
16 199612
17 200012
18 200011
19 199310
20 199810

About K.M. Koh

K.M. Koh is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 71 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Graph Theory Research (37 papers), Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems (33 papers), Graph theory and applications (24 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (18 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (17 papers), Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (12 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (8 papers) and Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (180 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (456 citations), Geometry and Topology (204 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (26 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (78 citations). K.M. Koh has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fengming Dong, Eng Guan Tay, Kok Lay Teo, Chung‐Piaw Teo, Douglas G. Rogers, Michael D. Hendy, George Grätzer, Michael Makkai, Charles H. C. Little and Yujun Cai. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete Mathematics, Journal of Graph Theory, Graphs and Combinatorics, Combinatorics Probability Computing and Discrete Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact