Klaus Mainzer

63 papers receiving 727 citations

Peers

Klaus Mainzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • History and Philosophy of Science 52
  • Management Science and Operations Research 140
  • Theoretical Computer Science 12
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 102
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 109
Replace Leo Narodny with:
Leo Narodny
Stephen H. Kellert United States
Kevin T. Kelly United States
F.W. Roush United States
Sunny Y. Auyang
Heinz von Foerster United States
Mark Burgin United States
Giuseppe Longo France
Josué Antonio Nescolarde‐Selva Spain
Jan M. Żytkow United States
Klaus Mainzer relative to Leo Narodny Leo Narodny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Leo Narodny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Klaus Mainzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Klaus Mainzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Klaus Mainzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Klaus Mainzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Klaus Mainzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Klaus Mainzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Klaus Mainzer. The network helps show where Klaus Mainzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Klaus Mainzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Klaus Mainzer Line = papers co-authored together Klaus Mainzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995145
2 199493
3 201249
4 199446
5 200543
6 199736
7 199535
8 201432
9 199130
10 200527
11 200325
12 198820
13 201615
14
Der kreative Zufall : wie das Neue in die Welt kommt
200714
15 199614
16 201114
17 200812
18 200911
19 199611
20 200910

About Klaus Mainzer

Klaus Mainzer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 73 papers that have together received 850 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (3 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (3 papers), Digital Innovation in Industries (2 papers), Innovation, Technology, and Society (2 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers) and Technology, Environment, Urban Planning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (52 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (140 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (12 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (102 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (109 citations). Klaus Mainzer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Rolf Landauer, Leon O. Chua, A. John Mallinckrodt, Alexander Prestel, Reinhold Remmert, Hans Hermes, Heinz-Dieter Ebbinghaus, Friedrich Hirzebruch, Jürgen Neukirch and Max Koecher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Progress in brain research, Foresight-Russia, Historia Mathematica and Journal of Physiology-Paris.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact