Kit Curtius
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
-
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Papers in
- Surgery 11
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment 9
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 4
-
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 5
- Co-authors
- Trevor A. Graham (11 shared papers)Nicholas A. Wright (2 shared papers)William D. Hazelton (10 shared papers)E. Georg Luebeck (10 shared papers)Jihyoun Jeon (3 shared papers)John M. Inadomi (5 shared papers)Ibrahim Al Bakir (6 shared papers)Amitabh Chak (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cancer Research (5 papers)PLoS Computational Biology (3 papers)Journal of Crohn s and Colitis (3 papers)Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (2 papers)Gut (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kit Curtius
34 papers receiving 872 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Cancer Research 223
- Oncology 197
- Modeling and Simulation 27
- Surgery 232
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 94
Countries citing papers authored by Kit Curtius
This map shows the geographic impact of Kit Curtius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kit Curtius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kit Curtius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kit Curtius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kit Curtius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kit Curtius. The network helps show where Kit Curtius may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kit Curtius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 322 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 8 |
About Kit Curtius
Kit Curtius is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 890 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (11 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (9 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (9 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (5 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (5 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (223 citations), Oncology (197 citations), Modeling and Simulation (27 citations), Surgery (232 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (94 citations). Kit Curtius has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Trevor A. Graham, Nicholas A. Wright, William D. Hazelton, E. Georg Luebeck, Jihyoun Jeon, John M. Inadomi, Ibrahim Al Bakir, Amitabh Chak, Joel H. Rubenstein and Chin Hur. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Research, PLoS Computational Biology, Journal of Crohn s and Colitis, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention and Gut.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.