Kim-ming Lee

489 citations
24 papers · 313 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Kim-ming Lee

21 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

Kim-ming Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Public Administration 38
  • Demography 70
  • Sociology and Political Science 202
  • Political Science and International Relations 92
  • Finance 35
Replace Chak Kwan Chan with:
Chak Kwan Chan United Kingdom
Alexandra Dobrowolsky Canada
Laksiri Jayasuriya Australia
Kwang‐Yeong Shin South Korea
Ted Cantle United States
Nicola Montagna United Kingdom
Constanza Tobío Spain
Duncan Sim United Kingdom
Willibrord de Graaf Netherlands
Anders Vassenden Norway
Kim-ming Lee relative to Chak Kwan Chan United Kingdom Chak Kwan Chan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Chak Kwan Chan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim-ming Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim-ming Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim-ming Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim-ming Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim-ming Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim-ming Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim-ming Lee. The network helps show where Kim-ming Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Kim-ming Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim-ming Lee Line = papers co-authored together Kim-ming Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200673
2 201248
3 200742
4 201525
5 200422
6 201321
7
Locating Globalization: The Changing Role of the City-state in Post-handover Hong Kong
200213
8 201413
9 200512
10 20119
11 20145
12 19995
13 20015
14 19974
15 20033
16 20183
17 20092
18
Hong Kong Chinese "orientalism": Discourse reflections on studying ethnic minorities in Hong Kong
20162
19 20132
20 20082

About Kim-ming Lee

Kim-ming Lee is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, General Health Professions and Demography, having authored 24 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (10 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (7 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (5 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (4 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (4 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (38 citations), Demography (70 citations), Sociology and Political Science (202 citations), Political Science and International Relations (92 citations) and Finance (35 citations). Kim-ming Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hung Wong, Ruby C. M. Chau, Sam W. K. Yu and Ngai Pun. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Public Administration, Women s Studies International Forum, China Perspectives, China Information and Journal of Contemporary Asia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact