Kimberly Tee
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Usability and User Interface Design
- Demography top 5%
- Technology Use by Older Adults
Papers in
-
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 4
- Usability and User Interface Design 4
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 3
-
- Personal Information Management and User Behavior 4
- Co-authors
- A. J. Bernheim Brush (2 shared papers)Kori Inkpen (2 shared papers)Carl Gutwin (3 shared papers)Saul Greenberg (4 shared papers)Barbara Purves (1 shared paper)Sidney Fels (1 shared paper)Leah Findlater (1 shared paper)Joanna McGrenere (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2 papers)Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (1 paper)Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kimberly Tee
7 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Human-Computer Interaction 147
- Demography 83
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
- Information Systems and Management 35
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 9
Countries citing papers authored by Kimberly Tee
This map shows the geographic impact of Kimberly Tee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kimberly Tee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kimberly Tee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kimberly Tee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kimberly Tee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kimberly Tee. The network helps show where Kimberly Tee may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Kimberly Tee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 0 |
About Kimberly Tee
Kimberly Tee is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems and Management, Management Information Systems, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 8 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (4 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (4 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (1 paper), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (1 paper), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (1 paper) and Technology Use by Older Adults (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (147 citations), Demography (83 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations), Information Systems and Management (35 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (9 citations). Kimberly Tee has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. J. Bernheim Brush, Kori Inkpen, Carl Gutwin, Saul Greenberg, Barbara Purves, Sidney Fels, Leah Findlater, Joanna McGrenere, Karyn Moffatt and Edward Tse. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.