Kim Schoemaker

934 citations
15 papers · 693 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Kim Schoemaker

14 papers receiving 666 citations

Peers

Kim Schoemaker
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 270
  • Clinical Psychology 366
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 110
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 130
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 82
Replace Maria Rogers with:
Maria Rogers Canada
Brendan F. Andrade Canada
Sébastien Normand Canada
Jeffrey R. Gagne United States
Kristen A. King United States
Lynne Tannenbaum United States
Raymond H. Baillargeon Canada
BEATRIZ M. STAGHEZZA United States
Paul J. Rosen United States
Luciane da Rosa Piccolo Brazil
Kim Schoemaker relative to Maria Rogers Canada Maria Rogers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Maria Rogers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Schoemaker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Schoemaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Schoemaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Schoemaker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Schoemaker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Schoemaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Schoemaker. The network helps show where Kim Schoemaker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Kim Schoemaker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Schoemaker Line = papers co-authored together Kim Schoemaker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2012275
2 2011160
3 201553
4 201746
5 201437
6 201530
7 201423
8 201721
9 201315
10 201613
11 20158
12 20138
13 20172
14 20211
15
Vechtscheidende ouders – Wie zijn dat?
20151

About Kim Schoemaker

Kim Schoemaker is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (7 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (270 citations), Clinical Psychology (366 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (110 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (130 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (82 citations). Kim Schoemaker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Walter Matthys, Maja Deković, Hanna Mulder, Tessa Bunte, Kimberly Andrews Espy, Sandra A. Wiebe, Catrin Finkenauer, J.C. de Schipper, Margreet Visser and David J. Hessen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Developmental Neuropsychology, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact