K.‐H. Adam

17 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

K.‐H. Adam
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 419
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 423
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 160
  • Animal Science and Zoology 57
  • Virology 19
Replace E. J. Ouldridge with:
E. J. Ouldridge United Kingdom
H. O. Böhm Austria
Miguel Rodríguez‐Pulido Spain
J. B. Brooksby United Kingdom
G Unger Germany
Tina M. Henry United States
I. Fernández Sainz United States
Kazuki Morioka Japan
Marialexia Alfano United States
Guozheng Cong China
K.‐H. Adam relative to E. J. Ouldridge United Kingdom E. J. Ouldridge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
E. J. Ouldridge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K.‐H. Adam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K.‐H. Adam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.‐H. Adam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.‐H. Adam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K.‐H. Adam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.‐H. Adam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.‐H. Adam. The network helps show where K.‐H. Adam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside K.‐H. Adam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K.‐H. Adam Line = papers co-authored together K.‐H. Adam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1982310
2 197743
3 200124
4 198922
5 199021
6 200321
7 197416
8 199314
9 199811
10 200010
11 197410
12 19919
13 19767
14 20046
15 20045
16 19783
17 20021

About K.‐H. Adam

K.‐H. Adam is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Agronomy and Crop Science, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (13 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (13 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (5 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (5 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (2 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers), 14-3-3 protein interactions (2 papers) and Poxvirus research and outbreaks (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (419 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (423 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (160 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (57 citations) and Virology (19 citations). K.‐H. Adam has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Karl G. Strohmaier, Otfried Marquardt, O.‐R. Kaaden, Md. Aminul Islam, Dario Leister, J. Voigt, H.‐J. Rziha, O. C. Straub, Christoph Dehio and M. Büttner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Virology, Virus Genes, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Microbiological Research and Veterinary Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact