Ker-Neng Lin

42 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Ker-Neng Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 692
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 69
  • Neurology 83
  • Physiology 233
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 180
Replace Stefanie Auer with:
Stefanie Auer United States
Cheryl A. Luis United States
Olga Lucía Pedraza Colombia
Heidi Rossetti United States
Anja Busse Germany
Andrew Kirk Canada
B.A. Lawlor Ireland
Hsiu-Chih Liu Taiwan
Nicolas Le Carret France
Carol Torossian United States
Ker-Neng Lin relative to Stefanie Auer United States Stefanie Auer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Stefanie Auer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ker-Neng Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ker-Neng Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ker-Neng Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ker-Neng Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ker-Neng Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ker-Neng Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ker-Neng Lin. The network helps show where Ker-Neng Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ker-Neng Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ker-Neng Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ker-Neng Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014185
2 2017147
3 2002126
4 200481
5 200476
6 199872
7 199454
8 200253
9 201147
10 200147
11 201346
12
[Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument, Chinese Version 2.0 (CASI C-2.0): administration and clinical application].
201245
13 201840
14 200940
15 200537
16 200237
17 201435
18 201531
19 199726
20 200625

About Ker-Neng Lin

Ker-Neng Lin is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (26 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (8 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers) and Neurological diseases and metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (692 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (69 citations), Neurology (83 citations), Physiology (233 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (180 citations). Ker-Neng Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Pei‐Ning Wang, Hsiu-Chih Liu, Wei‐Ta Chen, Chia Liu, Yu Sun, Ta‐Fu Chen, Li-Yu Tang, Jong‐Ling Fuh, Ming‐Jang Chiu and Chung‐Chih Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, International Psychogeriatrics, PLoS ONE and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact