Keren Baum

28 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Keren Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 240
  • Infectious Diseases 133
  • Neurology 65
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • Rheumatology 43
Replace Brandon P. Moss with:
Brandon P. Moss United States
Nada Abou-Fayssal United States
Miriam Kaminski Germany
Leonardo Sinisi Italy
Ana‐Luiza Sayao Canada
Valeria Barcella Italy
D. Carrara Italy
Laurent Suchet France
Alexandre H. C. Marques Brazil
Utku Şenol Türkiye
Keren Baum relative to Brandon P. Moss United States Brandon P. Moss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Brandon P. Moss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keren Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keren Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keren Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keren Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keren Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keren Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keren Baum. The network helps show where Keren Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keren Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keren Baum Line = papers co-authored together Keren Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004139
2 2016105
3 200463
4 200924
5 200722
6 201520
7 201419
8
Golden eggs: towards the rational regulation of oocyte donation.
200114
9 199614
10
Recurrent pterygia--laser therapy: a preliminary report.
199312
11 199011
12 20066
13 19904
14 19854
15 20154
16 19883
17 19863
18 20082
19 19862
20 19961

About Keren Baum

Keren Baum is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rheumatology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Sensory Systems, having authored 28 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (16 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (3 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (2 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (2 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (2 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (240 citations), Infectious Diseases (133 citations), Neurology (65 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations) and Rheumatology (43 citations). Keren Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Carolin Miltenburger, P. Scherer, Hans‐Günther Bauer, Harold A. Fernandez, Frederick T Koster, Lil J. Miedzinski, GREGORY J. MERTZ, Darrin S Goade, Howard A. Levy and Andrew T. Pavia. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, Neuroradiology, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, Multiple Sclerosis Journal and Nutrients.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact