Ken Pier

2.0k citations
14 papers · 1.3k · 1 hit paper · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ken Pier

14 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Ken Pier's Hit Papers

Toolglass and magic lenses 1993 · 811 citations
8110+11+22Years since publication250500750

Peers

Ken Pier
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Human-Computer Interaction 884
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 143
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 727
  • Information Systems and Management 138
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 321
Replace Kathy Ryall with:
Kathy Ryall United States
Daniel C. Robbins United States
M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale Canada
Jeffrey S. Pierce United States
Miguel A. Nacenta Canada
Gonzalo Ramos United States
Hans-Christian Jetter Germany
Maarten van Dantzich United States
Robert Ball United States
Thomas Baudel France
Ken Pier relative to Kathy Ryall United States Kathy Ryall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kathy Ryall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Pier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Pier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Pier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Pier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Pier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Pier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Pier. The network helps show where Ken Pier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ken Pier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Pier Line = papers co-authored together Ken Pier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
Toolglass and magic lenses
Hit paper breakdown →
1993811
2 1992267
3 199749
4 199442
5 199123
6 199717
7
An introduction to Gargoyle: an interactive illustration tool
198815
8 199212
9 19959
10
Measuring the Performance of Online Distributed Team Innovation (Learning) Services
20025
11 19935
12 19913
13 20033
14 19952

About Ken Pier

Ken Pier is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Information Systems and Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (5 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (4 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (2 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Digital Rights Management and Security (1 paper) and Optimization and Search Problems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (884 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (143 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (727 citations), Information Systems and Management (138 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (321 citations). Ken Pier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Eric A. Bier, Maureen Stone, William Buxton, Tony DeRose, Frank G. Halasz, David Lee, William C. Janssen, Richard Bruce, Scott Elrod and Brent Welch. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications and International Conference on Electronic Publishing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact