Ken Ohmachi

1.1k citations
50 papers · 679 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Ken Ohmachi

47 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers

Ken Ohmachi
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 391
  • Genetics 206
  • Oncology 306
  • Hematology 89
  • Neurology 97
Replace Emmanuelle Nicolas‐Virelizier with:
Emmanuelle Nicolas‐Virelizier France
Suguru Fukuhara Japan
Martin Dreyling Germany
C. Jonas Brazil
Richard H. van der Jagt Canada
Fiona Miall United Kingdom
Tariq Muzzafar United States
Catherine Traullé France
Qun‐pei Yang China
Darius Juškevičius Switzerland
Ken Ohmachi relative to Emmanuelle Nicolas‐Virelizier France Emmanuelle Nicolas‐Virelizier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Emmanuelle Nicolas‐Virelizier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Ohmachi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Ohmachi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Ohmachi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Ohmachi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Ohmachi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Ohmachi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Ohmachi. The network helps show where Ken Ohmachi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ken Ohmachi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Ohmachi Line = papers co-authored together Ken Ohmachi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013117
2 201458
3 201050
4 201948
5 201535
6 200332
7 201029
8 201928
9 201825
10 201125
11 201721
12 201721
13 201119
14 201516
15
Phase I Clinical Trial of Intravenous L-ascorbic Acid Following Salvage Chemotherapy for Relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
201415
16 201512
17 202211
18 201511
19 202011
20 202210

About Ken Ohmachi

Ken Ohmachi is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Hematology, Genetics and Neurology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (28 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (13 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (9 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (7 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (5 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (4 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (391 citations), Genetics (206 citations), Oncology (306 citations), Hematology (89 citations) and Neurology (97 citations). Ken Ohmachi has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Kiyoshi Ando, Michinori Ogura, Kensei Tobinai, Toshiki Uchida, Yoshiaki Ogawa, Hiroshi Kawada, Naokuni Uike, Ryujiro Hara, Yukari Shirasugi and Naoya Nakamura. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Hematology, Blood, Cancer Science, Annals of Hematology and Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hematopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact