Ken Fullerton

1.2k citations
27 papers · 801 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Ken Fullerton

26 papers receiving 753 citations

Peers

Ken Fullerton
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Rehabilitation 173
  • Emergency Medical Services 118
  • Epidemiology 283
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 156
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 111
Replace Megan K. Yee with:
Megan K. Yee United States
John Gommans New Zealand
Karin Ernström United States
Juan B. Gáldiz Spain
Mukul Sharma Canada
William R. Lewis United States
Sy‐Jou Chen Taiwan
Mohammed Yousufuddin United States
Paul Gerrard United States
Roberto F.E. Pedretti Italy
Ken Fullerton relative to Megan K. Yee United States Megan K. Yee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Megan K. Yee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Fullerton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Fullerton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Fullerton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Fullerton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Fullerton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Fullerton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Fullerton. The network helps show where Ken Fullerton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ken Fullerton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Fullerton Line = papers co-authored together Ken Fullerton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991176
2 1986133
3 1988106
4 200363
5 201146
6 199945
7 201241
8 198828
9 200326
10 199223
11 201219
12 201617
13 201114
14 201010
15 20109
16 20108
17
Modelling stroke patient pathways using survival analysis and simulation modelling
20096
18 20106
19 19854
20 20144

About Ken Fullerton

Ken Fullerton is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Epidemiology, Artificial Intelligence, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Rehabilitation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 801 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (11 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (5 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (2 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (173 citations), Emergency Medical Services (118 citations), Epidemiology (283 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (156 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (111 citations). Ken Fullerton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malta and Canada. Frequent co-authors include R. W. Stout, David McSherry, P A O'Neill, I. Davies, Derrick Bennett, Sally McClean, Lalit Garg, Maria Barton, Gilbert MacKenzie and Mick Power. Their work appears in journals such as QJM, Age and Ageing, Stroke, Postgraduate Medical Journal and IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact