Ken Eason

69 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ken Eason
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Human-Computer Interaction 266
  • Information Systems and Management 233
  • Management Information Systems 261
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 37
  • Medical Terminology 6
Replace Mark Hartswood with:
Mark Hartswood United Kingdom
Tobias Mettler Switzerland
Roger Slack United Kingdom
Arthur Money United Kingdom
Claus Bossen Denmark
Thomas Andreas Herrmann Germany
V. Vaishnavi India
Alex Voß United Kingdom
Jan Gulliksen Sweden
Eduard Fosch‐Villaronga Netherlands
Ken Eason relative to Mark Hartswood United Kingdom Mark Hartswood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Mark Hartswood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Eason

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Eason's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Eason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Eason more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Eason

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Eason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Eason. The network helps show where Ken Eason may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Ken Eason, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ken Eason Line = papers co-authored together Ken Eason links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Information Technology and Organizational Change
1989324
2 2002121
3 1984114
4 1981108
5 198281
6 200781
7 197674
8 200062
9 198761
10 201360
11 200152
12 199150
13 200036
14 201636
15 199633
16 201232
17 199721
18 201119
19 200918
20 198016

About Ken Eason

Ken Eason is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems and Management, Computer Science Applications, Management of Technology and Innovation and Health Information Management, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Systems Theories and Implementation (14 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (11 papers), Ergonomics and Human Factors (6 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (5 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (5 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers) and Open Source Software Innovations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (266 citations), Information Systems and Management (233 citations), Management Information Systems (261 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (37 citations) and Medical Terminology (6 citations). Ken Eason has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Susan Harker, Patrick E. Waterson, John E. Dobson, Liangzhi Yu, Sue Richardson, Wendy Olphert, Daniel Robey, Roger A. Haslam, John Strain and Mike Dent. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour and Information Technology, Applied Ergonomics, Ergonomics, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Interacting with Computers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact