Keith Somerville

742 citations
41 papers · 327 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Somerville

40 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Keith Somerville
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Communication 50
  • Development 25
  • Anthropology 44
  • Ecological Modeling 17
  • Sociology and Political Science 165
Replace Thomas W. Smith with:
Thomas W. Smith United States
Christopher Alan Anderson United States
S. Ravi Rajan United States
Rosana Guber Argentina
Adrian Peace Australia
Lívio Sansone Brazil
Helge Jordheim Norway
Elizabeth G. Traube United States
Peter Fry Brazil
Mark Solovey Canada
Keith Somerville relative to Thomas W. Smith United States Thomas W. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Thomas W. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Somerville

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Somerville's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Somerville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Somerville more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Somerville

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Somerville. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Somerville. The network helps show where Keith Somerville may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Keith Somerville, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Somerville Line = papers co-authored together Keith Somerville links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199535
2 201124
3 199023
4 199218
5 198718
6 202016
7 199116
8 202116
9 201215
10 201215
11 201711
12 201610
13 200910
14 20178
15 19918
16 20197
17 19937
18 19947
19 19897
20
Ivory: Power and Poaching in Africa
20176

About Keith Somerville

Keith Somerville is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 41 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (3 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (3 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (3 papers) and South African History and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (50 citations), Development (25 citations), Anthropology (44 citations), Ecological Modeling (17 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (165 citations). Keith Somerville has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Linda M. Heywood, Amy Dickman, Timothy M. Shaw, Zaki Laïdi, Paul J. Johnson, Adam G. Hart, Thomas J. A. Maguire, Gail M. Gerhart, Peter Coals and Peter Tyrrell. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, African Affairs, The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Journalism Studies and People and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact