Keith Reader

979 citations
69 papers · 375 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Reader

42 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

Keith Reader
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Classics 35
  • Literature and Literary Theory 99
  • History 94
  • Religious studies 24
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 20
Replace Ros Ballaster with:
Ros Ballaster United States
Judith Still United Kingdom
Katharine Hodgkin United Kingdom
Antony Easthope United States
Neil Hertz United States
Naomi Tadmor United Kingdom
Susan Groag Bell United States
Randolph Trumbach United States
Amy Hollywood United States
James Hardin United States
Keith Reader relative to Ros Ballaster United States Ros Ballaster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ros Ballaster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Reader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Reader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Reader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Reader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Reader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Reader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Reader. The network helps show where Keith Reader may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Keith Reader, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Reader Line = papers co-authored together Keith Reader links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200686
2 198249
3 201939
4 200635
5 198734
6 198812
7 19879
8 20029
9 19879
10 20118
11 20027
12
La Vie est a nous! : French cinema of the Popular Front 1935-1938
19866
13 19806
14
Regis Debray: A Critical Introduction
19956
15 19875
16 19974
17 20104
18 20013
19 19933
20 20033

About Keith Reader

Keith Reader is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, History and Philosophy of Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 69 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Historical and Cultural Studies (24 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (15 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (8 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (7 papers), French Literature and Criticism (3 papers), French Literature and Critical Theory (3 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (2 papers) and Middle East Politics and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (35 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (99 citations), History (94 citations), Religious studies (24 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (20 citations). Keith Reader has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Michèle Mattelart, André J.M. Prévos, Phil Powrie, Khursheed Wadia, Ginette Vincendeau, Armand Mattelart, Lynn A. Higgins, David H. Walker, R. S. Edwards and Hugh Dauncey. Their work appears in journals such as French Studies, Modern & Contemporary France, French Cultural Studies, Media Culture & Society and SubStance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact