Keith N. Egger

2.4k citations
58 papers · 2.1k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Keith N. Egger

58 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Keith N. Egger
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Plant Science 1.3k
  • Cell Biology 340
  • Soil Science 165
  • Pharmacology 137
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 120
Replace G. Bahnweg with:
G. Bahnweg Germany
Torda Varga Hungary
Marlis Reich Germany
Jonathan Michael Plett Australia
Hui‐ling Liao United States
Merje Toome‐Heller New Zealand
Lysett Wagner Germany
J.W. Deacon United Kingdom
D. Michael Benson United States
Victor Rafael Matos Coimbra Brazil
Keith N. Egger relative to G. Bahnweg Germany G. Bahnweg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
G. Bahnweg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith N. Egger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith N. Egger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith N. Egger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith N. Egger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith N. Egger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith N. Egger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith N. Egger. The network helps show where Keith N. Egger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith N. Egger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith N. Egger Line = papers co-authored together Keith N. Egger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995139
2 200187
3 199783
4 199883
5 200483
6 199382
7 199279
8 199574
9 199871
10 198668
11 200468
12 201167
13 198663
14 200159
15 200859
16 201257
17 200751
18 199946
19 199345
20 199839

About Keith N. Egger

Keith N. Egger is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology, Pharmacology, Soil Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (30 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (15 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (10 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (7 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (6 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (5 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (3 papers) and Fungal and yeast genetics research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.3k citations), Cell Biology (340 citations), Soil Science (165 citations), Pharmacology (137 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (120 citations). Keith N. Egger has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Hugues B. Massicotte, Lynne Sigler, Randolph S. Currah, Linda E. Tackaberry, Kei E. Fujimura, Greg H. R. Henry, Julie R. Deslippe, Sarah Hambleton, David S. Hibbett and Sara Landvik. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Mycorrhiza, Forest Ecology and Management and The ISME Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact