Keith Moser

597 citations
96 papers · 410 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
    • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
    • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies

Papers in

Keith Moser

68 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Keith Moser
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Oncology 124
  • Cancer Research 53
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 12
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 60
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 30
Replace Verena Schneider with:
Verena Schneider Germany
Jacqueline Ming Liu Taiwan
Silke Schlottmann United States
Lisha Sun China
Friederike Schmidt Germany
Yuki Matsuoka Japan
Adina Aviram Israel
Sing‐Huang Tan Singapore
Clayton D. Knox United States
Yves Communal France
Keith Moser relative to Verena Schneider Germany Verena Schneider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Verena Schneider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Moser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Moser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Moser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Moser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Moser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Moser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Moser. The network helps show where Keith Moser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Moser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Moser Line = papers co-authored together Keith Moser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198536
2 198335
3 198828
4 198326
5 197723
6 198519
7 200916
8 196615
9 196815
10 196813
11 196712
12 198211
13 198310
14 198910
15 197110
16 19889
17
[Oestrogen receptors and prognosis in breast cancer].
19809
18 19548
19 19676
20 19716

About Keith Moser

Keith Moser is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Literature and Literary Theory, Physiology and Philosophy, having authored 96 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Caribbean and African Literature and Culture (5 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (5 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (4 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (4 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (4 papers) and Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (124 citations), Cancer Research (53 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (12 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (60 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (30 citations). Keith Moser has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include U. Ganzinger, H. Rainer, Robert Dudczak, Christian Dittrich, Horst Wilde, O. Schlappack, S. Hauptmann, G. Steger, R. Kolb and D Magometschnigg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Molecular Medicine, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, Green Letters, French Cultural Studies and Semiotica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact