Keith Krapels

492 citations
59 papers · 330 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Krapels

51 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Keith Krapels
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Instrumentation 41
  • Media Technology 78
  • Aerospace Engineering 175
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 96
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 4
Replace D.A. Kozlowski with:
D.A. Kozlowski United Kingdom
Yoshinori Arimoto Japan
Szymon Gładysz Germany
Daniel A. LeMaster United States
Ronald R. Parenti United States
V. S. Rao Gudimetla United States
Philippe Martin-Gonthier France
D. Scribner United States
Keith Krapels relative to D.A. Kozlowski United Kingdom D.A. Kozlowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
D.A. Kozlowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Krapels

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Krapels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Krapels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Krapels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Krapels

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Krapels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Krapels. The network helps show where Keith Krapels may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Krapels, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Krapels Line = papers co-authored together Keith Krapels links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200130
2 200625
3 200719
4 200713
5 200413
6 201012
7 200712
8 201011
9 200211
10 200510
11 201210
12 200410
13 20009
14 20077
15 20017
16 20086
17 20066
18 20056
19 20046
20 20016

About Keith Krapels

Keith Krapels is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Instrumentation, having authored 59 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (42 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (19 papers), Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods (13 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (10 papers), Advanced Image Processing Techniques (8 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (8 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (7 papers) and Terahertz technology and applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (41 citations), Media Technology (78 citations), Aerospace Engineering (175 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (96 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (4 citations). Keith Krapels has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Colombia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Ronald G. Driggers, Richard H. Vollmerhausen, Carl E. Halford, Eddie L. Jacobs, John Palmer, Gerald C. Holst, Joseph P. Reynolds, John F. Dammann, S. Susan Young and Brian Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, IEEE Sensors Journal, Optical Engineering, Infrared Physics & Technology and Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact