William Potter

449 citations
52 papers · 319 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William Potter

44 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

William Potter
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 172
  • Instrumentation 18
  • Mechanics of Materials 101
  • Building and Construction 42
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 92
Replace Mark Landon with:
Mark Landon United States
A. Aloisio Italy
Layton C. Hale United States
Elvira Moeller United States
Jianxun Liu China
C. Williams United States
Brian Hutsel United States
Hansheng Peng China
Jianbin Zhou China
J. Lundin Sweden
William Potter relative to Mark Landon United States Mark Landon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Mark Landon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Potter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Potter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Potter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Potter. The network helps show where William Potter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Potter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Potter Line = papers co-authored together William Potter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201425
2 201724
3 200417
4 202013
5 202113
6 201413
7 201712
8 201812
9 201411
10 201111
11 201811
12 201311
13 201410
14 201810
15 20169
16 20139
17 20228
18 20007
19 20187
20 20226

About William Potter

William Potter is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Civil and Structural Engineering and Building and Construction, having authored 52 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (27 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (17 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (11 papers), Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete (9 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (8 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (7 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (6 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (172 citations), Instrumentation (18 citations), Mechanics of Materials (101 citations), Building and Construction (42 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (92 citations). William Potter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include B. R. Kusse, D. A. Hammer, J. B. Greenly, C. E. Seyler, Qun Zhao, Xiong Yang, Y. Ono, Amir Mirmiran, M. Arockiasamy and N. Qi. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Composites for Construction and PCI Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact