Keith Ewing

108 papers receiving 541 citations

Peers

Keith Ewing
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Public Administration 264
  • Library and Information Sciences 33
  • Law 181
  • Political Science and International Relations 373
  • Industrial relations 4
Replace Cynthia J. Bowling with:
Cynthia J. Bowling United States
Norman J. Ornstein United States
Meg Russell United Kingdom
Samuel Krislov United States
Anchrit Wille Netherlands
Susan M. Miller United States
Robert O. Berdahl United States
Robert Hazell United Kingdom
François Pétry Canada
Haig Patapan Australia
Keith Ewing relative to Cynthia J. Bowling United States Cynthia J. Bowling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16.5×
Cynthia J. Bowling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Ewing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Ewing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Ewing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Ewing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Ewing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Ewing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Ewing. The network helps show where Keith Ewing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Ewing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Ewing Line = papers co-authored together Keith Ewing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 128 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199947
2 200543
3 199543
4 201039
5
The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act
200824
6 200423
7 200118
8 200117
9 199216
10 201215
11
A Manifesto for Labour Law: towards a comprehensive revision of workers' rights
201615
12 202012
13 199812
14 201311
15 201711
16 201311
17 200311
18 199111
19 201710
20
Money, politics, and law
199210

About Keith Ewing

Keith Ewing is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management, having authored 128 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (60 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (25 papers), Discrimination and Equality Law (11 papers), European and International Law Studies (10 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (10 papers), Legal principles and applications (10 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (8 papers) and Digital Economy and Work Transformation (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (264 citations), Library and Information Sciences (33 citations), Law (181 citations), Political Science and International Relations (373 citations) and Industrial relations (4 citations). Keith Ewing has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert Hauptman, Conor Gearty, Joo‐Cheong Tham, Navraj Singh Ghaleigh, Alan Bogg, Peter Nolan, Aileen McColgan, Andrew Grubb, Sian Moore and Paul O’Higgins. Their work appears in journals such as Industrial Law Journal, The Cambridge Law Journal, Modern Law Review, Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy and Journal of Management Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact