Keith E. Williams

44 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Keith E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.3k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 783
  • Clinical Psychology 819
  • Pharmacy 87
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 251
Replace Irene Chatoor with:
Irene Chatoor United States
Melissa Maslin United States
Erika G. Gisel Canada
Meeta R. Patel United States
Valerie M. Volkert United States
Terry K. Crowe United States
Thomas R. Linscheid United States
Joy V. Browne United States
Lisa Edelson Switzerland
Claire Williams United Kingdom
Keith E. Williams relative to Irene Chatoor United States Irene Chatoor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Irene Chatoor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith E. Williams. The network helps show where Keith E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Keith E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004417
2 2003388
3 2005123
4 2012101
5 199871
6 200765
7 200862
8 200758
9 201045
10
Regulation and developmental expression of the divalent metal-ion transporter in the rat brain.
200045
11 199739
12 200935
13 201929
14 200827
15 198523
16 199122
17 201221
18 200720
19 200119
20 201119

About Keith E. Williams

Keith E. Williams is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (31 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (14 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (3 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (3 papers) and Infant Health and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (783 citations), Clinical Psychology (819 citations), Pharmacy (87 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (251 citations). Keith E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kimberly A. Schreck, Douglas G. Field, Angela F. Smith, Malcolm R. Garland, Katherine Riegel, Laura Seiverling, Peter Sturmey, Helen M. Hendy, Roberta L. Babbitt and Bridget A. Shore. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, Appetite, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Journal of Public Health and American Journal of Occupational Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact