Keith E. Johnson

459 citations
18 papers · 272 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Keith E. Johnson

17 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Keith E. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 33
  • Catalysis 36
  • Electrochemistry 20
  • Automotive Engineering 30
  • Polymers and Plastics 31
Replace Seong Ahn Hong with:
Seong Ahn Hong South Korea
Neha India
Donald D. Beck United States
Tianxia Liu China
Bharati Gupta Australia
Ye Qin China
Saijun Xiao China
Saifuddin Ahmed Egypt
Hongmei An United States
Keith E. Johnson relative to Seong Ahn Hong South Korea Seong Ahn Hong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Seong Ahn Hong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith E. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith E. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith E. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith E. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith E. Johnson. The network helps show where Keith E. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith E. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith E. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Keith E. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202056
2 197442
3 196639
4 200439
5 202125
6 196114
7 202113
8 196510
9 197110
10 19867
11 20235
12 20094
13 19713
14 20212
15 19971
16 20231
17 19681
18 20250

About Keith E. Johnson

Keith E. Johnson is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Automotive Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 18 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (5 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (3 papers), Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies (3 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (2 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (2 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (2 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (2 papers) and Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (33 citations), Catalysis (36 citations), Electrochemistry (20 citations), Automotive Engineering (30 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (31 citations). Keith E. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Donald T. Sawyer, Fernando J. Muzzio, Paulo E. Arratia, E. S. Szalai, T. S. Piper, Daniel S. Gianola, Matthew R. Begley, Raphaële J. Clément, Javier Read de Alaniz and Tyler R. Ray. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Materials & Design, ACS Macro Letters, Electrochimica Acta and Inorganic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact