Keith Blackburn

3.3k citations
50 papers · 2.0k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Keith Blackburn

48 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Keith Blackburn
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 635
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.4k
  • Finance 376
  • Accounting 326
  • Information Systems 419
Replace Arusha Cooray with:
Arusha Cooray Australia
Phillip Swagel United States
Niloy Bose United States
Fernando Lefort Chile
Pablo Zoido-Lobatón United States
Cyn‐Young Park Philippines
Kevin Sylwester United States
Rafael Doménech Spain
Shekhar Aiyar United States
Charalambos Tsangarides United States
Keith Blackburn relative to Arusha Cooray Australia Arusha Cooray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Arusha Cooray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Blackburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Blackburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Blackburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Blackburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Blackburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Blackburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Blackburn. The network helps show where Keith Blackburn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Keith Blackburn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Blackburn Line = papers co-authored together Keith Blackburn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998225
2 2005196
3 2012163
4 2002147
5
MONETARY POLICY AND POLICY CREDIBILITY THEORIES AND EVIDENCE
1988129
6 2009115
7 199988
8 201070
9 199267
10 200466
11 201060
12 199354
13 200054
14 200852
15 200550
16 200447
17 200641
18 201138
19 201137
20 200734

About Keith Blackburn

Keith Blackburn is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Information Systems and Finance, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (21 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (16 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (14 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (14 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (10 papers), Economic Growth and Development (8 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (8 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (635 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.4k citations), Finance (376 citations), Accounting (326 citations) and Information Systems (419 citations). Keith Blackburn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Niloy Bose, Victor T. Y. Hung, M. Emranul Haque, Giam Pietro Cipriani, Salvatore Capasso, Michael Christensen, Morten O. Ravn, Martín Solà, Alessandra Pelloni and Kyriakos C. Neanidis. Their work appears in journals such as Economics Letters, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Journal of International Money and Finance, Journal of Economic Surveys and Economica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact