Kees Doets

659 citations
18 papers · 457 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Kees Doets

17 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers

Kees Doets
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • History and Philosophy of Science 63
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 188
  • Artificial Intelligence 283
  • Theoretical Computer Science 9
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 41
Replace W. Thomas with:
W. Thomas Germany
Mitsuhiro Okada Japan
Lorenz Demey Belgium
Gerhard Gentzen
Angelo Margaris United States
Frederic B. Fitch United States
Peter Krauss United States
Lars Löfgren Sweden
Robert Veroff United States
Claudio Pizzi Italy
Kees Doets relative to W. Thomas Germany W. Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
W. Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kees Doets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kees Doets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kees Doets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kees Doets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kees Doets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kees Doets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kees Doets. The network helps show where Kees Doets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Kees Doets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kees Doets Line = papers co-authored together Kees Doets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 198392
2 199790
3 199454
4 199750
5 199438
6
Basic Model Theory
199636
7
The Haskell road to logic, maths and programming
200421
8 199814
9 201513
10 200113
11 198912
12 19939
13 19996
14 19913
15 19912
16 19892
17 20062
18 20130

About Kees Doets

Kees Doets is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Algebra and Number Theory, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (7 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (6 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (5 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (2 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers) and Advanced Control Systems Optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (63 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (188 citations), Artificial Intelligence (283 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (9 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (41 citations). Kees Doets has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Johan van Benthem, Daniele Mundici, María Luisa Dalla Chiara, Krzysztof R. Apt, Jan van Eijck, Scott Weinstein, Anuj Dawar, C. Niek van Dijk, Han Houdijk and Roel P.M. Hendrickx. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Journal of Biomechanics, Foot & Ankle International, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic and The Journal of Logic Programming.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact