Katherine Smith

1.9k citations
76 papers · 833 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Katherine Smith

66 papers receiving 770 citations

Peers

Katherine Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Spectroscopy 222
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 167
  • Aerospace Engineering 182
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 401
  • Biomedical Engineering 181
Replace Takanobu Kosugi with:
Takanobu Kosugi Japan
Óscar Rubiños Spain
Fei Xie China
W. Batty United Kingdom
Yong Zhou China
Jingwen He China
Michael J. Patterson United States
Warren J. Smith United Kingdom
Yan Zhuang China
H. Guerrero Spain
Katherine Smith relative to Takanobu Kosugi Japan Takanobu Kosugi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Takanobu Kosugi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Smith. The network helps show where Katherine Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Katherine Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Katherine Smith Line = papers co-authored together Katherine Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201979
2 200770
3 201551
4 202147
5 200946
6 200644
7 200637
8 202229
9 202024
10
Gender bias against and sexual harassment of AMWA members in Massachusetts.
199123
11 201223
12 201422
13 200621
14 201220
15 201219
16 201418
17 200916
18 200716
19 200715
20 202213

About Katherine Smith

Katherine Smith is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Spectroscopy, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 76 papers that have together received 833 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (22 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (18 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (11 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (7 papers), Space Satellite Systems and Control (5 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (5 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (222 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (167 citations), Aerospace Engineering (182 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (401 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (181 citations). Katherine Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include John Stark, Matthew S. Alexander, M.J. Roy, Nicholas H. Crisp, Peter Hollingsworth, K. H. Joy, Charles N. Ryan, Mark D. Paine, Herbert Shea and Min Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Astronautica, Journal of Applied Physics, Focaal, Journal of Propulsion and Power and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact