Katherine E. Belon

12 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Katherine E. Belon
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 267
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 58
  • Clinical Psychology 156
  • Pharmacy 26
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 109
Replace G.L.H. van den Wittenboer with:
G.L.H. van den Wittenboer Netherlands
Maureen E. McQuillan United States
Stephanie L. Allen Canada
J. A. Morrell United Kingdom
Kevin C. Mooney United States
Theodore F. Robles United States
Radhika Reddy United States
Beth Christiano United States
Xinming Jin China
Erin I. Kleifield United States
Katherine E. Belon relative to G.L.H. van den Wittenboer Netherlands G.L.H. van den Wittenboer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
G.L.H. van den Wittenboer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine E. Belon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine E. Belon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine E. Belon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine E. Belon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine E. Belon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine E. Belon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine E. Belon. The network helps show where Katherine E. Belon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Katherine E. Belon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Katherine E. Belon Line = papers co-authored together Katherine E. Belon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2010324
2 202049
3 201130
4 201819
5 201418
6 201416
7 201614
8 20229
9 20238
10 20198
11 20174
12
The Eating Attitudes Test and healthy eating : an investigation of the relationships between pathological eating, healthy eating, and normal dieting
20121

About Katherine E. Belon

Katherine E. Belon is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (1 paper) and Media Influence and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (267 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (58 citations), Clinical Psychology (156 citations), Pharmacy (26 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (109 citations). Katherine E. Belon has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Judith Owens, Jane Ellen Smith, Kelsey N. Serier, Elizabeth A. McLaughlin, Angela D. Bryan, Loren Gianini, Sarah J. Erickson, K. F. Kelton, Katie Witkiewitz and Harold D. Delaney. Their work appears in journals such as Eating Behaviors, Journal of Health Psychology, International Journal of Eating Disorders, American Journal of Health Promotion and Journal of Loss and Trauma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact