Kate Strand
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Neurological disorders and treatments
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Neurological diseases and metabolism
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Papers in
-
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 6
- Neurological disorders and treatments 4
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 3
- Neurological diseases and metabolism 2
-
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Janice L. Holton (6 shared papers)Tamás Révész (3 shared papers)Andrew J. Lees (4 shared papers)David R. Williams (1 shared paper)Alison K. Godbolt (1 shared paper)Keith A. Josephs (1 shared paper)Martin N. Rossor (1 shared paper)Safa Al‐Sarraj (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology (3 papers)Brain (3 papers)Movement Disorders (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Kate Strand
8 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Neurology 326
- Neurology 106
- Physiology 140
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 83
- Psychiatry and Mental health 37
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Strand
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Strand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Strand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Strand more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Strand
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Strand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Strand. The network helps show where Kate Strand may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Strand, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 156 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 125 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 4 | Occurrence of NKX3.1 C154T polymorphism in men with and without prostate cancer and studies of its effect on protein function. | 2002 | 30 |
| 5 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 3 |
About Kate Strand
Kate Strand is a scholar working on Neurology, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (2 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (1 paper), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper) and Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (326 citations), Neurology (106 citations), Physiology (140 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (83 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (37 citations). Kate Strand has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Janice L. Holton, Tamás Révész, Andrew J. Lees, David R. Williams, Alison K. Godbolt, Keith A. Josephs, Martin N. Rossor, Safa Al‐Sarraj, Naheed L. Khan and Tetsutaro Ozawa. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, Brain, Movement Disorders and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.