Kate Rees

2.6k citations
89 papers · 2.2k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Kate Rees

81 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Kate Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Pharmacology 294
  • Infectious Diseases 257
  • Clinical Biochemistry 87
  • Hepatology 94
  • Biochemistry 88
Replace Thomas M. O’Connell with:
Thomas M. O’Connell United States
David P. Figgitt New Zealand
Knox Van Dyke United States
Donald M. Marcus United States
Noboru Okamura Japan
J. R. Allen United States
František Štaud Czechia
Aaron Bendich United States
Xiao‐Ping Dong China
Petia Shipkova United States
Kate Rees relative to Thomas M. O’Connell United States Thomas M. O’Connell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Thomas M. O’Connell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Rees. The network helps show where Kate Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Rees Line = papers co-authored together Kate Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971163
2 1966146
3 2001130
4 1961107
5 1959107
6 196093
7 197186
8 195880
9 196176
10 199975
11 202073
12 196170
13 198864
14 195962
15 196248
16 196038
17 198637
18 195836
19 196633
20 201429

About Kate Rees

Kate Rees is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Surgery, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (16 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (9 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (4 papers), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (4 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (4 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (294 citations), Infectious Diseases (257 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (87 citations), Hepatology (94 citations) and Biochemistry (88 citations). Kate Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. D. Judah, M. J. R. Dawkins, W. G. Spector, C G Clark, G. F. Rowland, Michael McLean, James McIntyre, Helen Struthers, Linda Ho-Terry and George Terry. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, PLoS ONE, British Journal of Cancer, African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Infection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact